DUBSAR
GitHub
Menu

Professional audit

Decide with evidence.

Know what is coherent, what is proven, and what cannot be shown from the connected sources.

A decision-ready audit for AI automation agencies — and for products built with coding agents.

DUBSAR Audit examines authorized sources under a defined mandate. You receive evidence-linked findings, explicit limitations, prioritized actions, and a conclusion a human can stand behind. No perfect replay. No invented causality.

Audit my automations See the deliverable

Remote · Read-only by default · Bounded scope · Human-validated

Choose the question

Three audit mandates. One evidence discipline.

01 · Automation coherence

Do your automations produce coherent, traceable, and authorized actions?

Correlate n8n executions with CRM state. Detect duplicates, state-incompatible actions, and missing validation proofs — without inventing causality.

Outcome Evidence-linked findings, explicit coverage limits, and a human-sealed client report.

02 · Launch readiness

Are we actually ready to open this product to users?

Review the critical journey, installation, permissions, failure paths, documentation, billing, data handling, tests, and known limitations.

Outcome GO · GO under conditions · NO-GO, with blockers and an ordered action plan.

03 · Agent governance

Can we explain and verify how this project was built?

Review continuity, decisions, evidence, contradictions, validation points, and the boundary between agent action and human authority.

Outcome A governed account of what is established, uncertain, contradictory, or still awaiting a human decision.

Start

The audit runs in the portal. Guided work stays on Malt.

Self-serve audits (ingest → scan → Human Gate → sealed report) happen in the DUBSAR portal. That is the main product interface.

Open the audit portal Request a guided audit on Malt

Need a human-led push engagement beyond the self-serve portal? Request a guided audit on Malt.

Deliverable

A professional report built for action, not decoration.

DUBSAR Professional audit report
AI project governance Launch-readiness review Bounded scope · Evidence-backed · Human-validated
Overall decision GO under conditions
011 launch blockerEvidence and remediation required
023 conditionsTracked before public opening
036 controls passedSupported by reviewed evidence
042 limitationsExplicitly retained in the report
Evidence register Decision trail Prioritized action plan
Illustrative sample — the delivered report is adapted to the agreed mandate and available evidence.

The report is designed for executive and technical reading. It separates what was observed from what was inferred and what a human finally decided.

  • executive summary, mandate, and scope;
  • sources reviewed and known access gaps;
  • evidence-linked findings and severity;
  • contradictions, uncertainty, and limitations;
  • prioritized actions and decision-ready verdict;
  • evidence register for replay and review.

Report boundary

Evidence-backedHuman-validated

Delivery
PDF + evidence register
Mutations
None by default
Authority
Human conclusion

DUBSAR does not certify compliance, guarantee defect-free code, or turn incomplete evidence into certainty.

Any remediation or external action requires a separate explicit authorization.

Process

Controlled from portal scan to sealed report.

In the portal: connect sources, run the DUBSAR scan, attest anomalies at the Human Gate, seal, then export the client report. Guided Malt engagements agree scope and price before work starts.

  1. Qualification
  2. Mandate & scope
  3. Read-only collection
  4. Cross-analysis
  5. Human validation
  6. Report & closeout

What can be examined

The control pack follows the mandate.

Automation-coherence controls

n8nHubSpot

  1. 01Duplicated action (AC-01)
  2. 02State-incompatible action (AC-02)
  3. 03Insufficient validation proof (AC-03)
  4. 04Declared coverage and retention
  5. 05Workflow ↔ CRM correlation
  6. 06Human Gate decisions

AC-03 wording is fixed: “no proof found in the connected sources”.

Launch-readiness controls

ProductRelease

  1. 01Installation and onboarding
  2. 02Critical user journey
  3. 03Permissions and failure paths
  4. 04Tests and observed evidence
  5. 05Documentation and support
  6. 06Billing and data boundaries

Controls are selected and bounded during scoping.

Agent-governance controls

ContinuityAuthority

  1. 01Mission continuity
  2. 02Decision traceability
  3. 03Claim-to-evidence linkage
  4. 04Human authority
  5. 05Source contradictions
  6. 06Resumption continuity

Final classifications require human validation.

Possible authorized sources

Automation

  • n8n
  • Make

Business & CRM

  • HubSpot
  • Stripe (optional)

Engineering & delivery

  • GitHub
  • Jira
  • Azure Boards
  • Linear

Documentation

  • Confluence
  • Notion
  • Google Drive
  • Microsoft SharePoint

Communication

  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Gmail
  • Microsoft Outlook

Mandate-dependent

  • Controlled local exports
  • Microsoft Azure portal

Only sources explicitly approved in the mandate are collected. Email, CRM, local files, and the Azure portal require a precise, separately validated scope.

Operating boundaries

Professional restraint is part of the result.

  • No credentials, tokens, source archives, or connector access are collected through this website.
  • No project change, ticket, comment, or remediation is created by default.
  • No source is treated as complete or authoritative without qualification.
  • No result is delivered without human review.

Move fast — then establish what is actually ready and defensible.

Open the audit portal Guided audit on Malt Desktop licence